April 28, 2013
BEIRUT, Lebanon — On April 22-23, 2013 the International Research Networks (I.R.N.), a leading business intelligence group, organized in Beirut the Lebanon Oil & Gas 2013 Summit. This two-day summit brought together all the different stakeholders concerned with the development of Lebanon's offshore gas resources.
At this
preliminary stage of the process, the most expected speaker was Dr. Neil
Hodgson, the geologist who is the exploration director of Spectrum,
a Norway-based company, which has already completed 2-D and 3-D surveys of
Lebanon's seabed. The survey area of the Norwegian company is related to 3,000
square kilometers located in Lebanon's south-west exclusive economic zone
(E.E.Z.), which seems to have a high prospect of hydrocarbons.
The
E.E.Z. is the sea zone defined by the United Nations Convention on the Law of
the Sea over which a state has special rights for the exploration and use
of marine resources. It stretches from the seaward edge of a state's
territorial sea (12 nautical miles) out to 200 nautical miles from its coast.
It could also include the continental shelf beyond the 200-mile limit.
Dr.
Hodgson explained that recent data showed that the access to the offshore gas
wealth could be easier than previously thought. In fact, the conducted 3-D
surveys have permitted to understand that on Lebanon's offshore there are two
different plaques (layers). Initially, the assumption was that there was one
layer dating back to the same period as the Tamar and Leviathan's plaque,
offshore Israel. Instead, the big difference is the presence of a second
layer, which is shallower than the first one, and is located at a
depth of 3.5 kilometers. The second layer has high prospects and at
the same time could permit to reduce the operating efforts and consequently the
costs of tapping the resources, i.e., to have a much more commercially
viable product. It's worth remembering that for the first layer, the oil
and gas companies would have had to drill at a depth between 6 kilometers
to 7 kilometers — which would have resulted in high operating costs.
According to the expert, around 70 percent of Lebanon's offshore acreage has
already being mapped with 3-D seismic surveys and his company will in the next
week acquire another 3-D survey bringing data coverage to approximately 95 percent
of the offshore acreage. He then envisaged a timeframe of six to seven years
before the country is able to produce gas and underlined that this mapping
activity would permit the companies to spot immediately where to drill saving
from two to three years. Spectrum evaluates that, just in the 3,000 square kilometers
already analyzed, there could be between 30 TCF and 40 TCF of gas. He
concluded predicting that also the ground structures of west Bekaa Valley and
northern Bekaa are well compatible with the presence of hydrocarbons.
Moving
from the geologists to the economic experts and the people with energy
companies — the latter two categories have always to factor in additional
variables than the simple presence of hydrocarbons — the picture is at least
for now less enthusiastically oriented. Dr. Carole Nakhle, an energy economist
with the U.K. Surrey Energy Economic Center, pointed
out that there is a big danger for Lebanon because the gas business could
become consistently the largest industrial sector in the country. In fact,
the oil and gas sector, in general, is capital intensive; requires
relevant upfront investments; and does not create many new jobs, although it
may have a spillover effect for other sectors. In other words, the fear of the
Dutch Disease, a.k.a. resource curse, is quite evident, especially in a
country with weak government institutions. It will be of paramount importance
to pour oil and gas resources in the economy in a sustainable way avoiding
any possible currency appreciation ushering in a competitiveness reduction for
a country that already is not very competitive in many economic sectors.
This
call was also echoed by the words of Alia Mobayed, an economist with Barclays
MENA. Indeed, Lebanon has important twin deficits in its fiscal and current
account balances and once hydrocarbons revenues are available the priority
for the government should be to fix the twin deficits. Implementing an oil and
gas business is not an easy task. For several reasons, governments may have the
tendency to spend money that they will recover only in the
future. And, when there is a government spending spree, possible
cost overruns or delays could have a strong impact because they might
oblige the governments to renegotiate contracts with worsened conditions.
Several
times during the summit it was named Norway as the perfect example to be
followed in order not to be subjected to the Dutch Disease. In the oil and gas
sector Norway is always a role model (at the
summit there were also some lawyers with the Norwegian law firm Arntzende
Besche, which is specialized in the oil and gas practice, and Norway's
ambassador to Lebanon, Svein Aas) because it has well managed the energy sector
for more than 40 years. In Norway, the oil and gas industry is well
diversified, at an advanced level of liberalization and it has contributed to
the development of other sectors of the economy. The energy sector was founded
in 1965 when Oslo awarded the first production licenses. The country's national
oil company (N.O.C.) Statoil, which holds a 50 percent stake in the licenses,
was established in 1972. Six years later was created the Norwegian Petroleum
Directorate (N.P.D.) to fulfill the role of regulator and to grant licenses.
Then, in 2001 the government partly privatized the company selling around 20
percent to private investors. Finally, in 2007 Statoil merged with Hydro
Oil& Gas. Currently, the Norwegian government owns around 67 percent of the
new company Statoil ASA. Norway charges a high tax of 50 percent in addition to
the regular 28 percent corporate tax rate. Despite high taxes, foreign
investors have never stopped investing in Norway.
Booz & Co. (2011)
|
There
are no doubts that Norway's oil and gas sector is a model on a world
scale. If this model may be replicated in Lebanon is another story. The
well-known international and internal political challenges that may affect
Lebanon's oil and gas developments are:
- The incapacity of the government to establish a sound and transparent oil and gas sector under parliamentarian control.
- Marine disputes with neighboring countries.
- The different E.E.Z.s overlap part of their acreage according to the different national maps. Civil war in Syria could spread out into Lebanon.
But the real key element is the future
development of the global energy gas market. In fact, in the next 20 years
a vast quantity of natural gas will be put on the market. Between 2015 and 2020
Australia will expand its production of gas from 25 million tons per year to 88
million tons per year. The United States will produce over the next decade 230
million tons and it will double the global gas supply. Shale gas will be
developed in many countries scattered around the globe. In other words, in some
years Lebanon will enter a gas market where there should not be too many a
worry for gas shortage and where there will be more contractual flexibility.
These two factors mean: an abundance of gas; and less oil-indexed and
long-term gas contracts. Once again, the real game changer in order to maintain
high prices for natural gas could be a projected upsurge in demand from Asia,
mainly from China and the other Asian economic powerhouses. Houston
University's professor Michael Economides during the summit confirmed that
China's demand for natural gas out of its annual energy consumption would
increase from 4 percent today to 10 percent in 2020. Currently, L.N.G.
for delivery in May or June in northeast Asia costs $15.15 per Btu, the
lowest price since last November and down from a record $19.40 registered on
February 4, 2013. Prices in southeast Europe are around $12.90. These high
prices may disappear in the long-run and according to Professor Economides
there could be a price convergence in a three-year timeframe to approximately
$8 per unit.
Summing up, it possible that the gas
market will not be oversupplied, but there is a tendency toward a price
convergence at lower level in comparison to what has been
experienced up to now in Europe and Asia. And of course, Lebanon to be successful
will be obliged to commerce its gas at market prices. Plus, until
the energy companies do not start drilling and discover what the final
cost of the Lebanese gas is, it's difficult to build up reliable cost
simulations. Norway may well be the example to follow, but the macroeconomic
conditions of the 1970s were consistently different.
The summit saw the presence of four
important energy companies: U.S. Chevron,
Italy's Eni, Kuwait's Kufpec and U.A.E.'s Mubadala Petroleum. Energy
companies are accustomed to making profits in difficult and harsh environments.
An Eni official told the Italy
Kuwait Association (IKA) that "until we start drilling we don't know
exactly what we'll find". He continued stating that 2-D and 3-D surveys
are useful means, but they are not a guarantee of success. For the companies
the points to be clarified are:
- The demarcation of the 10 maritime exploration blocks, which range from 1,259 square kilometers to 2,374 square kilometers. At the moment there is only an unofficial map and it is unknown whether the government will auction off all the ten blocks during the first licensing round. It seems that blocks 8 and 9 will be put up for auction, but part of their acreage is disputed with Israel. Tendering them could trigger additional tensions in the region, although the oil and gas companies might not be deterred by boundary disputes.
- The definition of a revenue-sharing model. This is the nitty-gritty of the issue for the companies. The revenue-sharing model is the means through which they earn profits. And they need to know what this will be. Information about taxation, increments and terms of renewal, minimum work obligations are the basics on which companies may decide to bid for the 10 blocks.
Offshore Exploration Blocks (al-Akhbar leaked
version)
|
The summit was surely a useful occasion for bringing together all the involved parties in order to discuss about the future development of Lebanon's offshore gas resources. Now, in less than one week, the Lebanese government has to start providing some additional details to permit the energy companies to do their evaluations and then to bid.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.